Short law discussion
Question Description
I’m working on a criminal justice question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.
Stop and Frisk” is a lawful police action. With “Reasonable Suspicion” a police officer is allowed to stop an individual and question them about possible criminal activity. It also allows the police to frisk the individual for any weapons. The frisk can result in nothing being found to a gun being found [and everything in between.] Recently the use of “Stop and Frisk” has declined dramatically from record highs.
Make a Utilitarianism argument to support the use of “Stop and Frisk”.
Counter with a short argument using a theory [from the book] to argue against the use of “Stop and Frisk” in large numbers. Name the theory.
Have a similar assignment? "Place an order for your assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, guaranteeing you A results."