PSY 622 Milestone One: Case Scenario 1 Guidelines and Rubric
(Mental Health/Diminished Capacity Assessment)
Prompt: Review the collateral information of Case Scenario 1. In the Assessment Data section, review the raw data of the MMPI-2. Appropriately interpret the
scores. Based on your review of Therapeutic Risk Typologies, provide a one- to two-page recommendations report for child protective services.
Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:
I.
Mental Health/Diminished Capacity Assessment (Case Scenario 1)
a) Assess the extent to which the case study data set meets the Daubert standard (psychometrics). In other words, what is the known or potential
error rate? Has the data been derived using reliable methods? Is the data valid and reliable with regard to the scientific method?
b) Evaluate the interview information contained in the scenario for its implications in the risk assessment and recommendations process.
Substantiate your claims with specific research.
c) Evaluate the collateral information contained in the scenario for its implications in the risk assessment and recommendations process.
Substantiate your claims with specific research.
d) Create a recommendations report for risk management based on the above elements. Justify your position with specific scholarly research.
e) Be sure your recommendations report aligns with the ethical guidelines of a professional psychology association. Note: You do not need to
belong to an organization, but rather may view the ethical guidelines on the website of the organization of your choice.
Guidelines for Submission: The recommendations report should follow these formatting guidelines: 1 pages, double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font,
one-inch margins, and at least three citations in APA format.
Critical Elements
Mental
Health/Diminished
Capacity: Daubert
Mental
Health/Diminished
Capacity: Interview
Information
Proficient (100%)
Comprehensively assesses the
extent to which the case study
data set meets the Daubert
standard
Evaluates interview information
appropriately for its implications
in the risk assessment process
and substantiates claims with
specific research
Needs Improvement (75%)
Assesses the extent to which the
case study data set meets the
Daubert standard but with gaps in
accuracy or detail
Evaluates information but
evaluation is not appropriate to
the situation, or does not
substantiate claims with research
Not Evident (0%)
Does not assess the extent to
which the case study data set
meets the Daubert standard
Value
18
Does not evaluate interview
information
18
Mental
Health/Diminished
Capacity: Collateral
Information
Mental
Health/Diminished
Capacity:
Recommendations
Mental
Health/Diminished
Capacity: Ethical
Guidelines
Articulation of
Response
Evaluates collateral information
appropriately for its implications
in the risk assessment and
recommendations process and
substantiates claims with specific
research
Proposes appropriate
recommendations and justifies
with research
Employs appropriate ethical
guidelines of a professional
organization in making
recommendations
Submission has no major errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, or syntax
Evaluates collateral information
but evaluation is not appropriate
to the situation, or does not
substantiate claims with research
Does not evaluate collateral
information
18
Proposes recommendations that
are not appropriate to the
situation, or does not justify with
research
Employs ethical guidelines but
guidelines are not appropriate to
the situation or are not supported
by a professional organization
Submission has major errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, or syntax that negatively
impact readability and
articulation of main ideas
Does not propose
recommendations
18
Does not employ ethical
guidelines
18
Submission has critical errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, or syntax that prevent
understanding of ideas
10
Earned Total
100%

Purchase answer to see full
attachment