Where does traditional CJ theory (social control, social learning, rational choice and so on) fit into your current thinking about criminality today?  Where does emerging theory (restorative justice, strain theory,  alternatives responses to crime),  fit, or not fit,  into your current thinking?   

I expect you to engage in a critical analysis of all the materials offered in the course, comparing and contrasting different theoretical approaches in the context of your professional life (law enforcement) or the depiction of crime in the media. You will be able to select any basis for comparison:  effectiveness, practicality, victim consideration, reduction in recidivism, expense, and another contextual account of your choosing.
In the first paragraph, be sure to have a clear thesis that is analytical.  Indicate the context in which you evaluate the different CJ theoretical approaches, traditional and emerging.  Be sure to identify the basis of your comparison.

In the last paragraph (or Conclusion):  address how, and if, your views have shifted as a result of the course.  Reiterate what your opinions were (and are, if there has been a shift) about the central questions of the course:  what is a crime?  What causes it?  What should we do about it?

You are not required to have changed your original views to do well on this paper.  Whether you have or have not, be specific as to what is the source of your opinions, and remember you must cite your sources in APA fashion.

Course texts:

Crime and the American Dream.   Messner and Rosenfeld.   5th edition

The Rich Get Rich and the Poor Get Prison.   Jeffrey Reiman 11th edition