discussion Response
Description
Post at least ONE of your secondary responses to other students$iscussions
Please provide your feedback on their topics by asking questions and
criticizing the investigation
Peeràpost:
Hello Everyone,
For this discussion board I am talking about "Avoiding or disregarding: Exploring the
relationship between scope creep, project complexity" by Ahmed, R., & Jawad, M. (2022).
where the study's hypothesis were evaluated using regression and process methods. The results
showed that elements (i.e., technological, organizational, and human) that contribute to scope
creep have a negative impact on the accomplishment of construction projects, suggesting that
more scope creep has a lower likelihood of project accomplishment. Furthermore, the link
between scope creep and success is dramatically altered by project complexity, and more
complicated initiatives have lower success rates. According to the findings, organizational
factors, which must be taken into consideration during the project's planning and initial stages,
have the biggest influence on its success, followed by technical and human scope creep
difficulties. A survey approach is used to gather data from those involved in the building industry
in Pakistan.
A Population and sample size (positivism) methodology was used in this investigation. In this
methodology in order to investigate the effects of scope creep on project success, data from
construction projects in Pakistan were gathered using a survey approach. The subjects of this
study were construction projects, such as homes, businesses with high-rises, apartments with
high-rise homes, housing cooperatives, and office buildings. I personally feels that the methods
used by the author adequately proves the author's thesis and there is enough evidence to prove it
as well.
Pros of the positivism methodology is emphasis on empirical evidence, which can lead to more
reliable and accurate knowledge and quantifiable data can be easily replicated and tested. Cons
of the methodology are positivism can be too narrow in its focus on quantifiable data, ignoring
other forms of knowledge such as personal experiences or subjective perspectives and limited
generalizability of the findings.
Have a similar assignment? "Place an order for your assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, guaranteeing you A results."